Hmmm, Do we have the RIGHT to Link to Others Content?
Friday, July 30th, 2010Wow, never even crossed my mind to wonder if I had the right to link to someone or some entity’s content, especially when caution is used to give credit to the original poster. I mean, it’s done constantly. I do it myself in nearly every post. Every bit of information you ever wanted someone else to see is sent via a link.
Most sites need and want links. Everyone is happy when the link juice is flowing. Rankings, followers, users, and often sales and/or conversions go up when you have more inbound links. So what’s the problem?
Possibly because the news organizations are feeling the sting of social media, i.e., that it is becoming a news source in and of itself, some news organizations are lashing out, not wanting their stories linked to, and considering charging for access to their content.
Now, without getting into all kinds of discussion on whether or not it is ethical to link, I’ll just put my two cents in and then direct you to a guy who is fighting to make sure you keep your right to link. My thoughts are that as long as the content you are linking to is public, then you have every right to pass on the information. That’s how the web functions. Without linking, no one would ever get anywhere unless they knew every url and could go directly to every site. Forget search engines, forget ever emailing a cool site or that motorcycle on Craigslist to anyone. Forget including your clients in your online portfolio. Ridiculous.
Chris Crum over @ WebProNews had a pretty interesting article back in January on the right to link – worth taking a look. I personally hope this becomes a non-issue very soon.





