<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter for You?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://websense.thekarchergroup.com/is-twitter-for-you/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://websense.thekarchergroup.com/is-twitter-for-you</link>
	<description>Observations, Ideas and a little common sense about the web industry...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Traditional Media Being Outpaced by Social &#124; Twitter News &#124; Facebook News</title>
		<link>http://websense.thekarchergroup.com/is-twitter-for-you#comment-4728</link>
		<dc:creator>Traditional Media Being Outpaced by Social &#124; Twitter News &#124; Facebook News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websense.thekarchergroup.com/?p=364#comment-4728</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter could threaten the News Industry. I&#8217;ve pointed out several times on this blog when Twitter or Facebook was the first or only source of news of a certain event. I think this will continue to happen just by the very nature of mobile media. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter could threaten the News Industry. I&#8217;ve pointed out several times on this blog when Twitter or Facebook was the first or only source of news of a certain event. I think this will continue to happen just by the very nature of mobile media. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Karcher</title>
		<link>http://websense.thekarchergroup.com/is-twitter-for-you#comment-4455</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Karcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websense.thekarchergroup.com/?p=364#comment-4455</guid>
		<description>Thanks Nate.

I agree on the profitability question.  Most of these social sites will face that challenge.  At some point it'll be about making money.

I also agree with the comment on companies thinking long and hard about using it.  If they aren't going to use it for what it was intended for, and simply for advertising, it'll be a waste of time.  I think that holds true for just about any form of social media.

Thanks for the additional ideas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Nate.</p>
<p>I agree on the profitability question.  Most of these social sites will face that challenge.  At some point it&#8217;ll be about making money.</p>
<p>I also agree with the comment on companies thinking long and hard about using it.  If they aren&#8217;t going to use it for what it was intended for, and simply for advertising, it&#8217;ll be a waste of time.  I think that holds true for just about any form of social media.</p>
<p>Thanks for the additional ideas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Klaiber</title>
		<link>http://websense.thekarchergroup.com/is-twitter-for-you#comment-4454</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Klaiber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websense.thekarchergroup.com/?p=364#comment-4454</guid>
		<description>Hey Geoff,
I would question Twitter and their profitability (financially speaking) at this point. They haven't had any profit model up to this point, and have no intentions of adding one soon. The service has taken off recently, and as with any service that gains popularity, spammers start hitting it and companies try and use it to advertise. While it is another potential avenue, companies would need to think long/hard about their approach on twitter. 

Twitter is much more personalized in the sense that most people use it and connect with their other friends and read short snippets. The slightest bit of 'noise' in the midst of that can be easily turned off (or worse, blocked). It isn't an avenue of 'throw mud at the wall to see what sticks', as people can easily filter it out and ignore it (you can see this with an array of people who have tried going this route). Twitter is more personal than a myspace, facebook, etc - it has one single purpose, and when you try and interject in that one single purpose it can tend to leave a bad taste.

With that being said, it can still be useful (obviously). Companies can use it to search and see what other people are saying and be active in assisting people where necessary, or even finding passionate customers. Promoting things are good, but make sure you have different accounts to 1) build relationships, 2) promote. It makes it a pseudo RSS feed if people are interested and want to see it. There are many examples of this working for different companies (freshbooks, 37signals, authentic jobs, etc - to name a few).

Ultimately, one of the best ways companies can leverage it, without wasting time, is integrating with their API. This can allow them to seamlessly integrate with their website and services, and keep the communication stream open. A lot of ways to harness something like this...just a thought to add on to your already good ideas of utilizing twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Geoff,<br />
I would question Twitter and their profitability (financially speaking) at this point. They haven&#8217;t had any profit model up to this point, and have no intentions of adding one soon. The service has taken off recently, and as with any service that gains popularity, spammers start hitting it and companies try and use it to advertise. While it is another potential avenue, companies would need to think long/hard about their approach on twitter. </p>
<p>Twitter is much more personalized in the sense that most people use it and connect with their other friends and read short snippets. The slightest bit of &#8216;noise&#8217; in the midst of that can be easily turned off (or worse, blocked). It isn&#8217;t an avenue of &#8216;throw mud at the wall to see what sticks&#8217;, as people can easily filter it out and ignore it (you can see this with an array of people who have tried going this route). Twitter is more personal than a myspace, facebook, etc - it has one single purpose, and when you try and interject in that one single purpose it can tend to leave a bad taste.</p>
<p>With that being said, it can still be useful (obviously). Companies can use it to search and see what other people are saying and be active in assisting people where necessary, or even finding passionate customers. Promoting things are good, but make sure you have different accounts to 1) build relationships, 2) promote. It makes it a pseudo RSS feed if people are interested and want to see it. There are many examples of this working for different companies (freshbooks, 37signals, authentic jobs, etc - to name a few).</p>
<p>Ultimately, one of the best ways companies can leverage it, without wasting time, is integrating with their API. This can allow them to seamlessly integrate with their website and services, and keep the communication stream open. A lot of ways to harness something like this&#8230;just a thought to add on to your already good ideas of utilizing twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
